"A million old soldiers will fade away but a dream goes on forever"
Wednesday, November 30, 2005
Sneddon, vulture by conviction.
The guy fled the country asshole. You should know when to quit.
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
So you think that if Jacko committed other crimes, it's OK since nothing could be proven about the one he's been tried on thus far?
I'd bet the Bahrainis won't be real happy if he smuggles drugs into their country. I wonder if their laws (or random choices by their king) are as harsh as the ones in Singapore?
I simply think that doing wrong(as Jackson possibly/probably did) is not an excuse for the pursuit of one's own political agenda. Sneddon has been at it for almost 15 years. He has not won one case against Jackson, and he now gives the impression that he is searching for anything to get even. Simply out of spite. Because he lost so far.
I would not say anything as harsh as what I said in my blog-entry if a completely other law-enforcer would press charges against Jackson.
I think the guy(MJ) is a complete nutcase(see my previous entries about that. But I do not just condemn Jacko for this, the environment that he lived in for years and years made it possible). Everybody stood by and cheered when he bought Neverland. Everybody thought it was soooooooooo 'excentric' when he put a zoo there. Everybody marveled at his excentricity when he had all that plastic surgery. Everybody laughed when he put up swings for the kids, not to mention that rollercoaster he had installed. Hardly anybody had any interest in the downward-slide that he was on though everybody could see it.
As I have said before ; In lots of respects MJ has the mind and the thoughts of a 12-year old. And it gets him in trouble time and time again. Because the things people accept from a 12-year old are not accepted from anybody over the age of 16.
The guy was made into an excentric by his 'fans'. And now they are cutting him down at the knees. I call that hypocrisy.
And in the background you can see Sneddon smile, because he has found a high-profile target.
So no; I don't think that MJ should be acquitted if he has done something wrong. But I do question the 'moral highground' that Sneddon uses to persecute MJ time and again for his own agenda.
Because let's face it: Who could be a better target for a publicity-horny politician-to-be?
2 comments:
So you think that if Jacko committed other crimes, it's OK since nothing could be proven about the one he's been tried on thus far?
I'd bet the Bahrainis won't be real happy if he smuggles drugs into their country. I wonder if their laws (or random choices by their king) are as harsh as the ones in Singapore?
Hello Habap,
I simply think that doing wrong(as Jackson possibly/probably did) is not an excuse for the pursuit of one's own political agenda. Sneddon has been at it for almost 15 years. He has not won one case against Jackson, and he now gives the impression that he is searching for anything to get even. Simply out of spite. Because he lost so far.
I would not say anything as harsh as what I said in my blog-entry if a completely other law-enforcer would press charges against Jackson.
I think the guy(MJ) is a complete nutcase(see my previous entries about that. But I do not just condemn Jacko for this, the environment that he lived in for years and years made it possible). Everybody stood by and cheered when he bought Neverland. Everybody thought it was soooooooooo 'excentric' when he put a zoo there. Everybody marveled at his excentricity when he had all that plastic surgery. Everybody laughed when he put up swings for the kids, not to mention that rollercoaster he had installed. Hardly anybody had any interest in the downward-slide that he was on though everybody could see it.
As I have said before ; In lots of respects MJ has the mind and the thoughts of a 12-year old. And it gets him in trouble time and time again. Because the things people accept from a 12-year old are not accepted from anybody over the age of 16.
The guy was made into an excentric by his 'fans'. And now they are cutting him down at the knees. I call that hypocrisy.
And in the background you can see Sneddon smile, because he has found a high-profile target.
So no; I don't think that MJ should be acquitted if he has done something wrong. But I do question the 'moral highground' that Sneddon uses to persecute MJ time and again for his own agenda.
Because let's face it: Who could be a better target for a publicity-horny politician-to-be?
Post a Comment